Three Billion New Capitalists

I was reading through Clyde Prestowitz's "Three Billion New Capitalists - the Great shift of wealth and power to the east" that came in 2005. Like many of the books of the same era including the "World is Flat" it describes opportunities and challenges that is unfolding for America given the revolutionary changes that is occurring in India, China, Brazil & the East Europe-Russia. All these countries were warped in some kind of socio-communism till the late 1980's and (almost) everything came down with a thud with the fall of Berlin Wall. East Europe followed Germany into capitalism and USSR collapsed in 1991, India became almost bankrupt in 1991 and turned into a market economy partially due to the fact that its main export destination went down pinching foreign earning, China was forced to become a capitalist with a host of events including the Tiananmen square massacre in 1989 and Brazil became democratic with a new constitution in 1988. By now the concept of BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) has become a cliché for international economists.

The globalization process started since the 15th century when Turks captured Constantinople in 1453 closing an important trade route for the West with India. So, starting with Portugal, European countries were sending their great expeditions towards India and unimaginable wealth was found in Asia, Africa & Americas accidentally. This process was accelerated with the industrial revolution and Renaissance and by early 20th century the strains of protectionism-mercantilism that came as a reaction for globalization almost destroyed the world with two great World Wars, along with producing diseases of socialism, fascism, Nazism, communism, Maoism & Fabian (India).

This time the challenges are much more than the earlier rounds of capitalism-globalization that occurred till 1980s. The players were relatively small Japan, West Europe along with the big boss - America together accounting for a population of half billion+. But, the challenges that are posed with the rise of three billion new capitalists (from India, China, Russia, Brazil, East Europe) poses totally different challenges. Of fundamental worry is the Export imbalances caused by curency manipulation by Asian countries that causing dollar to be artificially strong and posing threat to everyone in the system.

The book covers a lot of these aspects and the author puts his vast experience in government commissions and private executive boards to explain how each of these challenges unfold and how US can cope up with them. Some of the interesting observations made by the author are:

1. Linkages between various sectors of economy: A lot of macroeconomists believe economies to be working linearly and free market principles can stabilize systems in almost no-time. For example, you lose an industry to abroad due to productivity difference and this will help you to have cheaper product and eventually you currency will depreciate and cost of labor will go down and you will eventually get equal or better industry. But, a lot of cases such things don’t happen. The author gives an example of how US companies like Ampex lost VCR business to Japan, thereby US lost all the additional things like disk storage & recording etc. and Japan built its CCD industry with VCR revolution and this led to Digital Cameras. Thus, by losing one industry US lost a dozen industries.

2. Economies are ecosystems: While dealing with biological & physical systems we are sometimes so amazed and shocked how important certain minor linkages are. Destruction of certain animals/plants or loss of certain soil & water streams can break an entire system just like how faulty screws could potential bring down great machinery. While biologists and ecologists are starting to appreciate such crucial links, economists are late in the game. The author gives an example of Silicon Valley. It is not just a place of producing h/w & s/w. It is a region watered by the great brains of Stanford & Berkeley, powered by thousands of venture capitalists, lawyers, Research labs and corporations and each are important to other. The corporations need universities for talent and Universities need corps for funding, and both require capital from the VCs & investment bankers. You break one linkage and you collapse the whole system. Thus, US should be careful of what it moves offshore and should make a few industries national priorities just like how biologists designate few animals to be endangered.

3. Currency manipulation & Monetary policy: The world system has gotten to a point, where one part of the world (read: America) is mad consuming while a lot of rest of the world is mad saving. Both cannot continue forever. Over saving is as bad as over consumption like what the great depressions showed. Like fat accumulation in the body, a lot of regions including Japan & China have accumulated a massive reserve of dollars (running in trillions) and they have no sound plans for consuming them. The system is thus very precarious and small moves can bring the entire system to a thud. So, major savers should diversify their savings and move a lot of it for domestic consumption. Major economies like China should move their focus from export-centric to serving their huge domestic markets. Interesting suggestions he gave include bringing Japan into dollar zone (effectively ending currency manipulation) and work with Europe & IMF to bring alterative international currencies to reduce the burden on dollar.

4. Energy security: US is spoilt with a couple of decades of cheap oil that brought new beasts like SUVs into the market. This has put it an unsustainable situation of consumer of more than a quarter of world oil. By a combination of activities including support of energy efficient vehicles, tougher standards for SUVs and support for alternate energy sources like oil from shale, tar and ethanol should be pursued to totally eliminate the dependence on Middle east oil as world oil reserves are going to be extremely pressured with the rise of the three billion people.

5. Focus on Education: Due to the policies that centered on baby boomer generation, US education is in a state of deep shit. There was a time when people could land in life long good employment with a mediocre high school graduation and such laxity has removed focus on a rigorous schooling curriculum. Teachers are underpaid and hence of poor quality, and due to legal action discipline is not properly enforced. Thus US lags the rest of the world in student quality and this must be redressed.

6. End US hegemony: Many of policies of US including the Iraq war are not adding any more friends to the US and now it has been totally isolated. So, it should focus on strengthening international institutions like UN & EU to share its burden and consult with the rest of the world in greater actions. As US is slowly losing its economic superiority comparable changes in defense policy must be made, and defense allocations pruned.

However, I disagree with the some of the observations of the author including his undue fear of wage equalization. Eventually, there will be a wage equalization where US and the rest of the world will come closer. This is because US gotten to where it was, because the great countries of the world were sleeping then. India & China contributed to 75% of world GDP till 17th century and then due to external intervention were totally broke & poor. In the meantime wars weakened Europe, and US got a golden chance to rebuild the world and in the process built a legendary economy. There were more kids and very little old men and so everybody got great safety nets and high school students landed in great jobs. US consumed half of world's major resources with one-twentieth of the population. So, what it reached in early 1980's & 90's were peaks that, in my opinion, can never be reached ever. As other nations start waking up there will be a need for equitable distribution of resources and balancing act will continue. Eventually, US will become like rest of the world consuming what it deserves and that is the best that could be hoped for a nation with scarce history & no ancient culture though they can partially equalized by great entrepreneurial spirit of the 19th & 20th centuries.

But, the challenges that involve the spreading of resources among the old and new owners will be anything but painless and great powers must ensure a smooth transition to ensure the continuity of the world.

Inflation! Why should India care?

There are two people - one a 70 year old man seen the best of his life and in a hospital bed and another is a 18 year old healthy boy playing an aggressive soccer game. Now, a rise/drop of blood pressure for the former by even a few percentage requires immediate attention and intervention by the doctors. But, what about the latter? Should same yardsticks be applied? Should the doctors barge in the middle of the game, and medically intervene if the heart rate marginally increased above 70?

This is the game that is currently going on in India. The pundits at Reserve Bank of India (RBI), worry day-in day-out anxiously watching the inflation jumping around 6%. They have reasons to worry. They follow a lot of practices of the US Federal Reserve, Bank of Japan & European ECB that have set their main mandates as controlling inflation, and growth is a footnote for them. But, at some point those worriers at RBI should ask themselves - are the comparisons valid? Inflation control makes sense for Europe, Japan & US that have had their best times, whose people lead a comfortable life currently, whose growth rates are barely a few notches above ZERO, and small changes in this stable economic equilibrium can wreck people's life-long savings and bring financial disasters. In many sense, they are like the 70 year old man - survivability and maintaining status quo is the key.

But, what about India that has just started to grow. Majority of its people are poor, not many have too much of life-long bank savings to worry about losing a percentage due to inflation, and a lot of development is just waiting to happen. Simply, status quo and economic equilibrium is not an option. If it a'int grows, it dies. As simple as that. In this condition, with growth rates clocking in excess of 9% and bank interest rates above 8%, why does a 6% inflation bother anybody? And a lot of this 6% is due to global factors including global rise in prices of wheat, corn & dairy, along with sky-rocketing oil prices, commodities including metals and increase in transportation costs.

Second, this higher inflation coming after two years of unusually low inflation rates. Before that period, even double digit inflation was not unusual. Thus, another part of the game is a lower base to start out with.

Third, apart from global forces, a lot of inflation is due supply side forces - less availability of developed urban areas, rusty food production and full capacity utilization in industries. A healthy inflation rate can and will encourage more entrepreneurs to add capacity and build more production. Farmers will be eager to increase food production and property developers can wipe out scarcity in good urban development. An artificial intervention, puts water in all these positive developments and precludes natural development that should have happened.

Fourth, increase in interest rates have put enormous strain on government finances and non-plan expenditures have skyrocketed leaving little for capital & infrastructure expenditures and this will cause further damage to this fragile nation badly in need of development.

So, its too early for RBI to nose in and spoil the exciting game. Simply, its interventions are unwarranted and unnecessary - the 18 year old boy can take a bit more increase in heart rate and can enjoy the game. RBI is dealing with a healthily growing country, not some ageing nation.

Last but not the least, RBI is a tiny factor in the world game with gazillions of liquid money. When US Fed, ECB & BoJ are finding it extremely hard to rein in this flood, its preposturous for RBI to think of putting brakes on it. If you are pressing too hard on a wet soap, you know the consequences.

So, RBI should know its limitations, and carefully guide the game externally instead of its fiats to banks. Rollback the interst rates close to international levels and work with the government on producing proper development and consider sector-wise tightening of capital through well-guided regulations.

India's growth model - China or America?

In the previous post, we discussed about whether India and China were ever equal. Now we will go further and discuss the right model for comparison: United States of America.

As the analysts are finding the last couple of years, India and United States are much more common than what most people think (did I just say that the world's poorest & richest country have some commonality). Superficially, India's english, democratic tradition & British colonial legacy are visible. But, we have just got started. There are much more deeper. We will randomly see them and then put them in place.

1. Hollywood Vs. Bollywood - You must be thinking that I'm just kidding, as movies are not a factor for world economy. It is. At one point, not long ago, Russia overtook US as a super power and Japan overtook US as an economic power. But, how many kids dreamed of Russia & Japan, tried to imitate their culture, flock to their universities or even learn traces of Russian & Japanese? But they did all that to US, because of a very powerful influence - Hollywood. It shaped the world cinema, and gave a way for imagination and thought. In all that imagination and dream world, only America was there and its perspective on the rest of the world. Interestingly, whereever they lived most kids saw world from the prism of United States. Thus, US got the best of world relationships, best of students & scientists & entrepreneurs and easily outsmarted its competitors. I'm not saying that Hollywood was solely responsible for America's growth, but without hollywood, a lot of American succcesses would have never happened. For a long time, US benefited from the export of Hollywoodism, McDonaldism & CocaColaism. Culture shapes billions of bucks and US companies & brands (from Ford, GE to Pepsi, Coca-Cola to Microsoft) became a marque for the world.

Coming to India: India's long lasting legacy in Asia it is its export of culture. Everwhere from Thailand, Malaysia to China, Japan, Middle East, coastal Africa... you could see great influence of indian culture. Thus, even without magnificent war & army India had conquered a huge territory, just by being a powerful holder of cultural exports. People from Columbus, Vasco Da Gama to English sailors to Chinese buddists flocked to India and dreamed on a trade with India. In a way, it is similiar to American export of culture, only a good form of culture :). And as Bollywood emerges, people from as far as Africa to East Asia will see world from an Indian prism and will bring both development and international relationships with that, and Indian companies will get the visibility and brand promotion it requires. Probably we might even convince Pakistan and China to have better friendhship with India.

This is also extendible to other media. Washington Post, Time magazine & CNN has so much effect on world media. Now India has many of the strengths and can take a part of the strength just how US took from UK (with BBC, Times etc.).

2. Enthusiasm & Entrepreneurism: If a Rip Van Winkle from 19th century America suddenly woke up in current India, he could find the comfort of home in it. 19th Century America didnt have infrastructure, had shabby roads and dusty towns, quarelling federal government, but its people had an unique power: An optimism for the future, a sense of pride and vision & an overbearing urge to succeed. They quickly moved from the heterogeneous group of colonies to bring powerful economic houses that dreamed of growing big and conquering the world. This fiery capitalism and energetic entrepreneuship is what we see in India - from slums to high raises. We are poor in infrastructure and shabby in our cities, and our heterogeneous is quarallesome, but our energetic young men & women are going to overcome all of that with the same sense of purpose our godfathers (19th century Americans) had.

3. Stress on Unity in Diversity: America has a great power, it quickly assimilates its immigrants much faster than any other country. The irish, jews, Italians, Germans who came during the last 100 years are now fully integrated as Americans. Though, there is great diversity in terms of immigrants (we have huge African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans, Asian-Americans and of course European Americans) representing every continent in the world. But, they all are almost united on a concept: American (albeit diversity and fractionsim are growing).
Historically, only one other country had such a track record: India. It had such a power that whoever came to the land became Indians (or Hindus). We definitely have an exceptions like Islamics who will never be assimiliated anywhere. The Greeks, Afgans, Aryans, East Asians, Mongols, Arabs are all fully assimilated and the art & culture as an example for it. Thus, it has such a diversity (in language, religion, art forms) but a soft thread runs among all, conscious or sub-conscious. A sense of Indianism. A lot of Indians will oppose when I say it, till they feel their subconscious emotion of it at different times.

India's scorching growth

In the recent days, I'm pretty much disappointed with what economists forecast for India. I'm not rather disappointed at Indian growth, rather, I'm disappointed at the skills of the economists :P. I dont know whether they understand the whole picture and take all the information into account of what is happening to India. The other day, I found an economist's article totally questioning the India's growth statistics just on the premise that the growth of services is unusual for a growing economy, and he just had the east asian economies in mind, when saying that. I also read a gazillion articles of why people should invest in China, and why India is overheating, India will be affected by slow downs, India is just call-center centric, blah blah blah. Let me get around to my own understanding of what is happening.

First, the obvious. India's IT & BPO are having extrordinary growth. At this rate, the IT exports alone would cross $60billion in 2010 and the overall revenues might get closer to $100b. A lot of people are worrying about the rise of China and other players, lack of quality engineers in India and rising pays and these area all honest fears. But, these fears are not all big enough to rock Indian boat, and Indian entrepreneurs are smart to see through innovative solutions. They plan to buy out a number of foreign operators in the the competing countries, giving them both expanding market & foreclosing competition, and their greater clout could lead to more techonology exchange and capital for investing. By aggressively entering cheap Tier-II & III cities, having dedicated massive training programs to train cheaper non-engineering workforce, they can effectively blunt many of the cost-based fears, and by better market diversification and innovation they have also broadened their approach.

For most Indian economic focusers, their prediction ends here and they are myopic enough not to look ahead. The following ones are going to be the trailblazers that are going to outsmart the Indian IT growth and overshadow them in the next decade.

1. Telecom - By far this is going to be the strongest sector for India in the next decade. In the last three years, our teledensity tripled and now we add 7 million mobile phones a month. At this rate we would move from our current presence of 180 million phones to over 250 million by 2007 and over 500 million by the end of this decade. This would place us head-head with China, and overtake US. Already, VSNL & Reliance's FLAG Telecom's hold the world's largest backbone telecom networks, (undersea cables & fiber optics handling most of Pacific & Atlantic lines) and this greater domestic clout will lead to greater buy outs in the saturated markets & bring more technology to India.

See: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/News_By_Industry/Telecom/Flag_to_invest_15b_to_expand_cable_capacity/articleshow/969357.cms

Increasing Telecom clout would also lead to two major developments. First, is the growth of India as a major electronics player. To produce 500 million phones and for peculiar needs, major telecom companies are already increasing their massive presence in India in production, and such stellar demand for these devices would place us closer to China & Taiwan on electronics industry, using the same strengths in IT growth - good design knowledge, better English understanding & now backed by world's one of the largest markets. Second, the greater teledensity would enable better information exchange and ease of trade and commerce, and would lead to a stellar growth in a lot of sectors, particularly in rural areas that are the focus of cellular expansion from now.

2. Metals & Infrastructure - While analysts always crib about the India's faltering infrastructure, not much of a note is taken when a single state (one of the poorest) secured over 40 deals for investments in this core sectors worth a whopping $100b in a year. Given cheap labor, low cost of procurement and abundance of resources, 100 billion might be worth half a trillion in this state of Orissa. And, with that Reliance is planning to build a 12GW plant (world's largest single power plant), POSCO, Mittal & Tata for massive steel capacity expansion, stunning Aluminium expansion by Vedanta industries et al. and port and road/rail link expansion by a combination of players. Since, this is a poor state such developments can lead to stunning growth and these players are already building a city foused on health care & IT.

See: http://www.domain-b.com/industry/general/20061221_aluminium.html

Similiar to Delhi Metro, a lot of other expansion is expected to happen in city metro systems for almost all major cities including Pune & Bangalore, and this would pump billions of dollars in a decade & growth activities. Indian Railways has also emerged a strong company in the last couple of years and eyes on a massive expansion, including modernization of Railway stations with Private participation, Container privitizations, electrification etc. A number of road ways projects are moving at a breakneck pace, and in aviation India became the largest customer for planes in the last couple of years, and dozens of new airlines have started or staring by 2010 and airports like Delhi's & Mumbai's are going to get agreat facelift. All these might get in over $300 billion in the next couple of years, and if government plays right it would push India's manufacturing, construction sectors to new heights.

3. Banking & Finance- Though often ridiculed, the government owned banks have moved a great deal in the last decade. From being indifferent and lethargic, their employees have increased their zeal in expanding further. Indian banks are among the healthiest in Asia with the lowest Non Performing Assets, and greater branch coverage. With the sector opening up due for 2009, a huge growth is waiting to happen when new foreign banks will emerge and modernize the practices and the Indian banks would have a great footprint abroad. Public banks like Canara Bank, State Bank & Bank of India are aggressive on a massive expansion both in India and abroad along with private guys like ICICI & YES bank. With greater diversification into equity trading, investment banking, Indian banking sector is expected to grow leaps and bounds with their current strength and with that India's core sector will be pushed up, as they are the largest lenders & employers. Also, innovations like Microcredit are earnestly explored causing a potentially great rural expansion. India's stength with a huge number of finace & commerce students will not just lead Finance BPO expansion, but also massive stock & financial sector in India.

4. Organized Retail - This is one sector that would be a killer application in the future, as they start from almost nil, and would soon have over $50 billion investment in the next couple of years. Reliance has setup a highly ambition project of over few thousand outlets & Malls, Bharti with its Walmart tieup is looking to do big, and other smaller players will try to outbeat them by going early. The prospective opening up of FDI along with a greater middle class will let this sector grow by 100% in the next few years, as all these ambitious projects get along, and dozens of international bigwigs enter it. This would greatly increase the Indian revenue generation (current retail industry hardly contributes to revenue due to massive tax evasion), bring greater employment, reduce the prices & consumer inflation (ha! We have Walmart). But, to me the greatest development will be for Indian agriculture. Indian farmers hardly get a 5% of what they produce, while even with Wal-Mart squeezing American farmers get many times more than that. This is due to lowering wastage (this could be as much as 90% in India vegetables & fruits), increase farming productity with greater technology interchange & cutting down the middleman. Thus, we might finally have our Green Revoltion - II, finally.

5. Hoteling & Real Estate - Enough has been said about the fact that India has just as many hotel rooms as the New York City. While this is a disgrace, see it as a potential. As 99% of the market seems to be unutilized, with proper planning the hoteling industry can easily grow at 100% without reaching saturation for a long time. Atleast 75 International brands are eyeing India, and with proper real estate growth and better technology/infrastructure and greater tourism/business growth, this sector will add 100's of thousands of new hotel rooms in the budget and the luxury sector. Organized Real Estate will piggyback the growth of these & the retail industry. While the prime lands are at huge prices, still we have millions of hectares of lands at low prices of less than $2/sq ft, around the cities and these have huge potential for growth. For eg. a lot of hoteling industry is eyeing for the smaller city of Noida that has land at a fraction of price compared to the prime lands of Delhi. Indian Railways is also planning to share thousands of hectares of its land around the big railway stations for building hotels. A great hoteling expansion would in turn stengthen the tourism industry.

Read More here: http://www.hospitalitynet.org/news/154000355/4029788.search?query=india+china+growth

6. Healthcare & Pharma- By now you should have heard that medical costs in India are among the lowest in the world. Thus, we have a huge potential for expanding this booming industry as more and more people can now afford medical facilities leadind to a huge domestic expanision, and a lot of countries are thinking about formally sending their patients to India for treatment. And, Indian pharma companies are leading a great expanision, and busy buying assets abroad and expanding R&D facilities. Thus, with greater middle class clout and prosperity, these two industries will have a massive growth as more people can get medical care, and more drug development will be done in India.

7. Auto - There was a time when blindly took outdated european car designs and manufactured small amounts of car for domestic use. The times are changing. In Chennai alone four major manufacturers are setting up huge factories, Tata Motors is world's one of the largest medium & heavy commercial vehicle producer & also eyeing for a $2000 car. In auto components, India is slowly becoming the world's largest manufacturer. With great domestic market growth & a potential for cost cutting using cheap labor & facilities, a lot of foreign majors like BMW, Nissan, Fiat are entering India, big time.

8. Agriculture - Indian agricultural productivity lags behind world standards by a factor of few times though it has some of the best climatic and land advantage than all the other major nations. If the production is too low, then the wastage (which goes as high as 90% for some products) kills whatever remaining and due to inefficient practices we are not growing more lucrative crops. As technology, infrastructure & organized retail growth, are looming, this sector could close in on the international productivity standards, and this means we can have over 300% growth in the end value of what we produce, given our potential. This might take over a decade, but still if we have a potential for 300%+ growth in India's core sector in the long term, its effect on industrial consumption and Indian growth rate will grow exponentially.

As the article gets long & winding, I had to cut a lot of material and you could search online for each of the individual developments. The outcome it seems that, inspite of global slowdown India could maintain and increase growth, as the Indian core sector is starting from a very low base, and most of these developments can continue in spite of a weak world consumption, as they are based on domestic consumption that is again growing from world's lowest per-capita. Though, India could possibly slow in the medium term, in the long term, it could easily maintain a 10%+ growth, as all these segments above can maintain a double to triple digit growth in the near future.

A world recession can also indirectly benefit India, when its hungry entrepreneurs can get value buy outs at cheaper prices (like how VSNL & Reliance boughtout world's major telecom backbones like Tyco & FLAG). It would also hit upon the margins of international producers who might eye India for greater cost cutting, and Indian government would be more amenable to opening up to overcome the world recession. It would also make companies to look for the bigger & fast moving Indian market than the saturated world markets (like how Vodafone & Oracle are doing) and bring more investments. We benefitted from the American recession of 2001-02 (it increased outsourcing and cheapened telecom assets) and I guess we could now repeat the performance.

The writing on the wall is clear: India can grow inspite of what happens in the rest of the world - receding or prospering.

Should Indian government subsidize oil?

This question has been puzzling me and the answer to the question "Should Indian govt. control the petrol/diesel prices" produces an answer even baffling to me. I'm a free market supporter and in general against government intervention, but I feel Indian govt is not too wrong in controling the oil prices at the moment. At the same time, I also feel we in the US are enjoying a much cheaper petrol and the government here must raise the prices by increased taxes. I'll explain my contradictory position in this article.

Background:
In India, oil prices are not directly determined by the world prices, but controlled by the government in a process called APM (Administered Price Mechanism). What this means is that periodically, based on the international prices, government would set a prices for Petrol (Gasoline), Diesel (used by trucks), Kerosene (used by poor for cooking & lighting) and LPG (used for cooking by middle class) and all the oil market companies have to fix to that price. The price is set in a way that oil companies make profits on Gasoline, break even on Diesel and losses on Kerosene & LPG, and in return get compensated by government bonds.

In an effort to curtail inflation (and score political points ahead of forthcoming elections), the government has reduced the oil prices though the oil companies are still making losses out of subsidies on Kerosen & Diesel. A lot of columnists have blasted the government, and for once I'm not going to attack the government.

In India, currently after the reduction the price for petrol (gasoline) is around Rs.50/liter ($4.18/gallon) compared to US prices of around $2.3/gallon, while Diesel costs around Rs.32/liter ($2.55/gallon) almost the same price as in the US. And India has better refineries and slightly hence lesser cost of fuel production and distribution. Thus, its not correct to say that Indian government subsidizes oil. In effect, what Indian govt does is to tax the fuel heavily and then make profits at all levels mostly going to state & provincial governments.

So, gasoline in India is not cheaper than most countries and this makes sense as India should curtail the use of more cars till the necessary infrastructure comes up, and even then it is better not to go the American way of automobilzation. High gasoline price makes sense, but very high prices can affect sectors like tourism etc. and so I believe that current prices for petrol are neither too high nor too low. And the pricing of Diesel at lower rate makes sense, because Diesel is much more efficient (40% more power compared to Petrol) and it emits just 69% as much greenhouse gases as petrol for every kilometer of ride. Thus, by encouraging the Diesel usage government is pushing more people out of the more inefficient and nasty petrol towards a shade better Diesel. Moreover, Diesel is used by trucks transporting essential items and public transportation (Trains & Buses), apart from small captive power plants. Thus, Diesel subsidization encourages a more healthier practice of relying on public transportation rather than Automobilzation a trap that America got into. Now, US is considering more sops for Diesel based cars. And, since diesel is used in core sectors, a lower price will curtail inflation in a lot of sectors.

Now, coming to the sacred cow of Kerosene & LPG the main cooking and lighting source for the poor and middle class respectively. India has a ultra low price for Kerosene almost half the cost of production and this alone leads to a loss of over $2b/year and a similiar amount in LPG. I believe that LPG prices have to be gradually increased so that it breaks even, while some efforts must be made to modify Kerosene distribution. $2b is not a big deal for trillion dollar economy and the Indian government can effectively carry on protecting the poor for a longer time from the vissicitudes of global economy. The poor spend considerable portion of their earnings on energy, food & transportation and all these are directly affected by the fuel costs, and the resulting unrest can put the economy down by tens of billions of dollars, and hence Kerosene subsidies make sense. But, distribution mechanisms must be modified so that it reaches the appropriate persons and to protect the blackmarket sale and adulteration into petrol and other fuels. This paper has proposed good methods for this problem.

http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/publications/data/2006-07-06smorris.pdf

Global oil prices are erratic and you cannot have mechanisms that directly reflect the global prices in a developing economy. Oil prices swing from $10 to $80 in 5 years before coming to $50 in a few months, and this could totally collapse a fledgling economy like India, if the government doesn't interefere and smoothen things out. If you calculate all the taxes that various governing bodies in India make out of oil, it could easily compensate for the various subsidies - notably in Kerosene & LPG. And, even if you have to spend a couple of billion dollars more, its worth it to keep running an economy that adds $100billion to GDP every year. And to compensate the oil majors for the loss, the government has to provide sops, though in the long run I would prefer a more simple system, where the government reduces taxes on these oil products and also take away some of the sops from the companies. The non-m0netary sops including governmental intervention and support for acquiring global oil assets and exploration of alternative fuels and efficient systems should be pursued more.

In the end, I believe that India's currently policy of keeping a higher price for gasoline and a moderate price for diesel makes sense and should be continued. While the oil companies face losses due to this, they could easily be compensated with the government bonds, which inturn can be paid from the taxes the government earns on these fuels. And LPG prices in the long run should get in par with the global market, while Kerosene subsidies should continue but mechanisms must be reformed to ensure appropriate distribution.

Regarding the situation in US, I recommend higher prices and here is a slightly older post, but still relevant to the current issue.

Rate hikes counter productive - Part II

The previous post had given an introduction to the sectors that could face trouble due to the rate hikes. We will go further on analyzing the ramifications.

First, the rate hike would pressurize a fledgling banking system in India. Indian banks are tiny compared to world standards, inspite of India having one of the deepest and oldest financial markets and some of the best talent in this arena. One of the main reason for this is the over meddling of Indian government in its affairs. Now, things are going for worse. The Prime Lending rate in India has climbed above 12% for many banks, while you could borrow at 5% in Libor (London) or around 1% in Yen nominated loans from Japan. And, given that Indian rupee has bullish prospects both in short & long term, the overseas loans would have an effective rate of less than 3% in rupee terms. To add to this, recently Standard & Poor has upgraded India's ratings and thus, Indian corporations could get better rates due to lesser perceived risk. Thus, any corporation that could borrow from overseas will skip Indian banks and get it at the concessional rates. So, when you read about Tata or Birla's mega acquisitions and dont read any Indian bank acting as the banker for the deal, dont be too surprized. By being burdened with enormous rates, Indian banks lose out the best customers and have to be put up with the lousy ones.

Second, RBI would slowly lose control of Indian market. By forcing more companies to look outward for loans, RBI has little leverage over the market and over the course of time market would act independent of RBI's whims & wishes and long term rates would be less under control. This is somewhat similiar to the situation with US Fed that has control over short term rates but has little control over the long term rates. While, it is debatable whether RBI should have greater control over the economy or not, but an economy totally running out of governmental controls might get reckless if the markets are not mature and deep.

Third, small & medium scale enterprizes would lose out of competition. Large concerns like Tata, Reliance, Birlas, Essar, etc. could borrow at international rates, while their smaller rivals back home cannot do that and have to put up with twice the cost in interest rates. In many businesses that run on lower margins, a small change in the rates could topple the competition totally towards other side and kill a lot of fledgling enterprises that is essentially not good for the country.

In Part 3, we would see what other steps India could take to counter the current inflation crisis

Bank of Japan (BoJ) rises rates: What are the impacts?

It was a pretty interesting post and I agree to most of the contents. While, writing this I find BoJ has increased the rates to 0.5% and this surprize jolt has hurt a lot of speculators.

The speculators and short term traders will get hurt by any upward moment of the currency (strangely the currecy moved downward yesterday, as the rate increase was below expectation of few organizations) and/or increse in rates.

However, long term is a different story. I dont believe Japan/Germany can ever attain the state they were once in the early 80's. The world economy then looked totally different with tiny nations like Japan, UK, Germany, Italy along with their big boss US controlled the world economy. Now, those days of tiny tots are gone, and big wigs - BRICs are entering the show and if terrorism could be controlled even Middle east will join the show.

What this means is that not only there is enormous potential for greater depths for world markets, but also that these nations are no longer in US control to take things like Plaza Accord or Bretton-Woods agreements.

These nations by their size and population have enormous appetite for capital and can easily suck in trillions of dollars in the next decade for their development to come in par with the west. Atleast India, with its huge infrastructural requirement could suck few hundred billions in the next couple of years.

So, Japanese currency's appreciation potential will get diminished as they face import pressures due to rising oil prices and export pressures, where even countries like India would join as competitors for electronics, Auto and Steel. And with current deflation there is very little room for upward movement of currecy and the ageing society doesnt want to spend as much as their younger counterparts.

So, my guess is that these new countries could suck the entire investment fountains dry and would coast on the wealth that Japan and Germany built up for decades.

It is great time for countries like India that has great entrepreneurship scope but limited access to capital (till very recently) and can use this great "Akshaya Pathra" for supercharging growth.